Gentrification is good. New urbanism is the tool for positive development.

A friend of mine recently sent me a quite discouraging article by Andres Duany that appeared in the journal American Enterprise. The short version reads as the title of this post. His title is worse, even more short-sighted and apolitical: “Three cheers for gentrification: It helps revive cities and doesn’t hurt the poor“.

“Those bourgeois elites are just “piggybacking” on positive gentrification. They only do good things for the neighborhood and the community, but it just looks bad “from the outside”. And, new urbanist principles with roots in acultural/acontextual, environmentally-deterministic design will actually help their communities. The form will tell them how to create community/culture. Nostalgia will save us.  The gentrifiers/developers are just “community partners” then, right? What other interests could they have? And since we are powerless to stop it, then let them win. Lets just concede. Consensus can be reached.  All we need is old-looking neighborhoods with brick buildings. ”

– Andres Duany
[This is satire.]
Advertisements

About anthony

Urban.Studies.Energy.Politics.Ecology.

One comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: